🚧 Beta Version - Bugs may occur. Report an issue
Photo of Pierre-Edouard Dollet

Pierre-Edouard Dollet

KRAAINEM Member since May 2024
Ranking
C15.5 - 35 pts
Current points
151,67
Matches played
19 Last 6 months
Win rate
40% Last 10 matches
Best Performances
24/07/2025
Ranking at the time: C30.4 (10)
11/12/2025
Ranking at the time: C30.1 (25)
29/08/2025
Ranking at the time: C30.4 (10)

Player matches

DEFEAT

Round: Pre-qualification 1st round

6/4 6/2
vs Nicolas van Dievoet C30.3 (15)
VICTORY

Round: Semi-final

6/3 6/2
vs Lancelot de Halleux C30.5 (5)
VICTORY

Round: Quarter-final

7/6 1/6 6/0
vs Gilles Gruwez C30.4 (10)
VICTORY

Round: Round of 16

6/3 6/0
vs Michel Marquant C30.5 (5)
VICTORY

Round: 2nd round

3/6 6/3 6/3
vs Quentin Bouko C30.6 (3)
DEFEAT

Round: Last round of qualification

5/7 6/4 6/3
vs Vincent Cornet C30 (30)
VICTORY

Round: Qualification 1st round

6/1 6/2
vs Nathan Vijt C30.4 (10)
DEFEAT

Round: Semi-final

6/2 6/3
vs Samuele Dossi C30.5 (5)
VICTORY

Round: Quarter-final

6/4 4/6
vs Pieter-Jan Deschamps C30.5 (5)
VICTORY

Round: Round of 16

4/6 6/2 6/3
vs Cedric D'Harveng C30.6 (3)
DEFEAT

Round: Last round of qualification

6/2 6/2
vs Alexandre Mortier C30.2 (20) · Seed 6
DEFEAT

Round: Quarter-final

7/5 6/1
vs Antonin Cabirou C30.4 (10)
VICTORY

Round: Round of 16

6/7 6/2 6/4
vs Cédric Peiffer C30.5 (5)
DEFEAT

Round: Semi-final

6/1 6/2
vs Joachim Debois C30.6 (3)
VICTORY

Round: Quarter-final

6/3 6/2
vs Dario NICOLELLA C30.5 (5)
Showing 46-60 of 68 matches

Interclubs matches

Loss

Messieurs 35 REG 2 · Round 1

Sat 25 Apr

0.5 2.5
Away · vs 3 FONTAINES B (3 FONTAINES)

Individual matches

D 6/3 3/6 6/2

Ranking and club history

Ranking and clubs evolution over time

C15.5 Current 35 KRAAINEM
C30.1 01/10/2025 25 KRAAINEM
C30.4 01/05/2025 10 KRAAINEM
C30.4 01/10/2024 10 KRAAINEM
C30.6 01/05/2024 3 KRAAINEM

Points history

How your points (cumulative ranking) changed over time.

14/05/2026 151,67 pts
21/04/2026 154,72 pts
07/04/2026 141,30 pts
31/10/2025 96,20 pts
Is your data incorrect?
Let us know