🚧 Beta Version - Bugs may occur. Report an issue
Photo of David Spronck

David Spronck

RICHELLOIS Member since October 2016
Ranking
C15.5 - 35 pts
Current points
158,97
Matches played
10 Last 6 months
Win rate
80% Last 10 matches
Best Performances
21/08/2025
Ranking at the time: C30.4 (10)
07/08/2025
Ranking at the time: C30.4 (10)

Player matches

DEFEAT

Round: Semi-final

7/5 6/2
vs Steve Seronval C30 (30)
VICTORY

Round: Quarter-final

6/4 6/1
vs Yves Noel C30 (30) · Seed 2
DEFEAT

Round: Semi-final

6/0 6/2
vs Michael Thys C30 (30)
VICTORY

Round: Quarter-final

6/3 6/2
vs Julien Polmans C30 (30) · Seed 3
VICTORY

Round: Last round of qualification

7/5 6/2
vs Leon Mornard C30.1 (25)
VICTORY

Round: Qualification 1st round

6/2 6/2
vs Timothy Cengiarotti C30.5 (5)
VICTORY

Round: Final

6/4 6/2
vs Jérémy Jobé C30.5 (5)
VICTORY

Round: Semi-final

6/2 6/2
vs Pierre-Henry Mulkay C30.5 (5)
VICTORY

Round: Quarter-final

6/3 6/2
vs Marc Linder C30.4 (10)
VICTORY

Round: Round of 16

6/1 6/2
vs Michaël Cécius C30.6 (3)
DEFEAT

Round: Semi-final

6/3 6/7 6/2
vs Jerome Thelen C30.2 (20)
VICTORY

Round: Quarter-final

3/6 0/5
vs Julien Jardon C30 (30) · Seed 2
DEFEAT

Round: Semi-final

6/0 6/3
VICTORY

Round: Quarter-final

6/2 6/2
vs Raphael Legros C30.6 (3)
VICTORY

Round: Round of 16

6/2 6/0
vs Thierry Copette C30.5 (5)
Showing 16-30 of 31 matches

Ranking and club history

Ranking and clubs evolution over time

C15.5 Current 35 RICHELLOIS
C30.1 01/10/2025 25 RICHELLOIS
C30.4 01/05/2025 10 RICHELLOIS
C30.4 01/10/2024 10 RICHELLOIS
C30.4 01/05/2024 10 RICHELLOIS
C30.4 01/10/2023 10 RICHELLOIS
C30.4 01/05/2023 10 RICHELLOIS
C30.3 01/10/2022 15 RICHELLOIS
C30.3 01/05/2022 15 RICHELLOIS
C30.3 01/10/2021 15 RICHELLOIS
C30.2 01/10/2020 20 RICHELLOIS
C30.2 01/10/2019 20 RICHELLOIS
C30.4 01/10/2018 10 RICHELLOIS
NC 01/10/2017 1 RICHELLOIS
NC 01/10/2016 1 RICHELLOIS

Points history

How your points (cumulative ranking) changed over time.

15/05/2026 158,97 pts
07/04/2026 145,04 pts
15/11/2025 101,74 pts
Is your data incorrect?
Let us know