🚧 Beta Version - Bugs may occur. Report an issue
Photo of Nicolas van Oyen

Nicolas van Oyen

Ranking
B-4/6 - 85 pts
Matches played
16 Last 6 months
Win rate
40% Last 10 matches

Player matches

DEFEAT

Round: Quarter-final

6/1 6/3
vs Sem Sarrazijn B-2/6 (80) · Seed D
DEFEAT

Round: Final

6/3 3/6 7/5
vs Victor Debruyne B-2/6 (80)
VICTORY

Round: Semi-final

7/5 6/2
vs Jorik Cleenewerck B-2/6 (80)
VICTORY

Round: Quarter-final

6/0 6/3
vs Bram Nevens B-2/6 (80) · Seed 4
VICTORY

Round: Qualification quarter-final

6/3 6/3
vs Mathias Magnus B+2/6 (70)
DEFEAT

Round: Semi-final

7/5 6/2
vs Maxime Lantsoght B-2/6 (80)
VICTORY

Round: Quarter-final

6/2 6/4
vs Guillaume Cardon B-2/6 (80) · Seed D
DEFEAT

Round: Qualification round of 16

6/4 6/3
vs Daan Vulsteke B+4/6 (65)
DEFEAT

Round: Qualification round of 32

3/6 7/6 6/4
vs Leon Wildiers B0 (75)

KTCB Enkeltornooi · 28 Jul 2025

ENKEL HEREN 2
DEFEAT

Round: Qualification quarter-final

6/3 5/7 6/4
vs Leonard Meulemeester B-2/6 (80)
VICTORY

Round: Qualification round of 16

6/0 6/1
vs Mathis Welvaert B+4/6 (65)
DEFEAT

Round: Quarter-final

6/0 7/5
vs Lucas Bogaert B-15 (90) · Seed 2
VICTORY

Round: Qualification quarter-final

7/6 7/5
vs Jarne Fraeye B-2/6 (80)
VICTORY

Round: Qualification round of 16

6/3 6/1
vs Jamay van Craeynest B+4/6 (65)
DEFEAT

Round: Round of 16

6/2 7/5
vs Bram Nevens B-2/6 (80) · Seed 7
Showing 16-30 of 59 matches

Ranking and club history

Ranking and clubs evolution over time

B-4/6 Current 85 BRUGHIA
B-4/6 01/10/2025 85 BRUGHIA
B-2/6 01/05/2025 80 -
B-2/6 01/10/2024 80 -
B-2/6 01/05/2024 80 -
B-4/6 01/10/2023 85 -
B-2/6 01/05/2023 80 -
B-2/6 01/10/2022 80 -
B+2/6 01/05/2022 70 -
B+2/6 01/10/2021 70 -
B+4/6 01/10/2020 65 -
B+4/6 01/10/2019 65 -
B+4/6 01/12/2018 65 -
B+2/6 01/10/2018 70 -
B+4/6 01/01/2018 65 -
C15.2 01/01/2017 50 -
C15.3 01/01/2016 45 -
C30 01/01/2015 30 -
C30.3 01/01/2014 15 -
C30.3 01/01/2013 15 -
C30.4 01/01/2012 10 -
C30.4 01/01/2011 10 -
C30.5 01/01/2010 5 -
C30.5 01/01/2009 5 -
C30.5 01/01/2008 5 -
Is your data incorrect?
Let us know