🚧 Beta Version - Bugs may occur. Report an issue
Photo of Alexander Roobrouck

Alexander Roobrouck

Ranking
B+2/6 - 70 pts
Matches played
22 Last 6 months
Win rate
60% Last 10 matches
Best Performances
04/04/2026
Ranking at the time: C15 (60) · Seed C
13/08/2025
Ranking at the time: C15.4 (40)
30/06/2025
Ranking at the time: C15.4 (40) · Seed B

Player matches

DEFEAT

Round: Semi-final

6/0 7/5
vs Gregory Hermans C15.2 (50)
VICTORY

Round: Quarter-final

6/2 6/1
vs Ferre Vanhessche C15.3 (45) · Seed 3
VICTORY

Round: Qualification quarter-final

2/6 6/3 7/5
vs Maarten Vanlede C15.3 (45)
VICTORY

Round: Qualification round of 16

6/0 6/1
vs Rik Rosseau C15.4 (40)
DEFEAT

Round: Semi-final

6/2 6/1
vs Noah van Hulle C15.2 (50)
VICTORY

Round: Quarter-final

6/3 7/6
vs Noah Minnaert C15.2 (50) · Seed 4
VICTORY

Round: Qualification quarter-final

6/1 6/3
vs Haakon Hoste C15.2 (50) · Seed 1
VICTORY

Round: Qualification round of 16

6/3 6/2
vs Timo van Rengen C15.4 (40)
DEFEAT

Round: Final

6/3 3/0
vs Cedric Beugnies C15.4 (40)
VICTORY

Round: Semi-final

5/7 6/4 6/2
vs Raf Vreys C15.2 (50)
VICTORY

Round: Quarter-final

6/2 6/3
vs Wietse Tack C15.3 (45) · Seed 4
VICTORY

Round: Qualification quarter-final

6/2 6/3
vs Alex Verschuere C15.3 (45) · Seed 3
VICTORY

Round: Qualification round of 16

6/2 6/2
vs Kenneth Toebaert C15.5 (35)
VICTORY

Round: Final

6/2 1/6 6/3
vs Joachim Roose C15.4 (40)
VICTORY

Round: Semi-final

6/4 6/0
vs Alex Verschuere C15.3 (45)
Showing 31-45 of 74 matches

Ranking and club history

Ranking and clubs evolution over time

B+2/6 Current 70 TENNISCLUB PARK RONSE
C15 01/10/2025 60 T.C. WAREGEM GAVER
C15.4 01/05/2025 40 -
C15.4 01/10/2024 40 -
C30.1 01/05/2024 25 -
C30.2 01/10/2023 20 -
C30.4 01/05/2023 10 -
C30.5 01/10/2022 5 -
C30.6 01/05/2022 3 -
C30.6 01/10/2021 3 -
C30.5 01/10/2020 5 -
C30.6 01/10/2019 3 -
C30.5 01/12/2018 5 -
11.8 01/10/2018 1 -
C30.5 01/01/2018 5 -
C30.5 01/01/2017 5 -
C30.5 01/01/2016 5 -
C30.5 01/01/2015 5 -
C30.5 01/01/2014 5 -
C30.5 01/01/2013 5 -
Is your data incorrect?
Let us know