🚧 Beta Version - Bugs may occur. Report an issue
Photo of Vic Dedobbeleer

Vic Dedobbeleer

Ranking
C15.1 - 55 pts
Matches played
9 Last 6 months
Win rate
20% Last 10 matches
Best Performances
26/06/2025
Ranking at the time: C15.4 (40) · Seed B
22/08/2025
Ranking at the time: C15.4 (40)
22/08/2025
Ranking at the time: C15.4 (40)

Player matches

DEFEAT

Round: Qualification round of 16

6/1 2/1
vs Esteban Delannoy C15.5 (35)
DEFEAT

Round: Final

6/2 6/2
vs Antoine Huyghebaert C15.3 (45)
VICTORY

Round: Semi-final

Walk-Over
vs Bart Lacroix C15.3 (45)
VICTORY

Round: Quarter-final

Walk-Over
vs Bruylant Steven C15.2 (50) · Seed 1
VICTORY

Round: Qualification quarter-final

6/2 6/4
vs Frédéric Blondeel C15.5 (35)
VICTORY

Round: Qualification round of 16

6/0 6/1
vs Maxim Dewaele C15.4 (40)
DEFEAT

Round: Quarter-final

4/6 6/0 6/1
vs Vince Dewae C15.2 (50) · Seed 1
VICTORY

Round: Qualification quarter-final

1/6 7/6 7/5
vs Mike van Loock C30 (30)

Enkeltornooi · 26 Jun 2025

ENKEL HEREN 4
DEFEAT

Round: Semi-final

7/5 6/2
vs Iebe Guldemont C15.3 (45)
VICTORY

Round: Quarter-final

1/6 7/5 7/5
vs Nick Claus C15.2 (50) · Seed 1
VICTORY

Round: Qualification quarter-final

6/2 6/3
vs Jorre van Geite C15.5 (35)
VICTORY

Round: Qualification round of 16

6/4 7/6
vs Binke Verbeken C30 (30)
VICTORY

Round: Final

3/6 6/2 7/6
vs Jesse Kiermer C30.2 (20)
VICTORY

Round: Semi-final

6/1 7/5
vs Dieter Vanhee C30.1 (25)
VICTORY

Round: Quarter-final

7/6 7/5
vs Van Wesemael Joachim C30.3 (15) · Seed D
Showing 16-30 of 40 matches

Ranking and club history

Ranking and clubs evolution over time

C15.1 Current 55 TENNIS S.D.I. VZW
C15.1 01/10/2025 55 BRUSSELSE T.C.
C15.4 01/05/2025 40 -
C30 01/10/2024 30 -
C30 01/05/2024 30 -
C30.1 01/10/2023 25 -
C30.5 01/05/2023 5 -
C30.6 01/10/2022 3 -
13.7 01/05/2022 2 -
13.7 01/10/2021 2 -
C30.6 01/10/2020 3 -
11.7 01/10/2019 2 -
C30.5 01/12/2018 5 -
11.8 01/10/2018 1 -
C30.5 01/01/2018 5 -
C30.5 01/01/2017 5 -
C30.5 01/01/2016 5 -
C30.5 01/01/2015 5 -
C30.5 01/01/2014 5 -
Is your data incorrect?
Let us know