🚧 Beta Version - Bugs may occur. Report an issue
Photo of Mattis Baele

Mattis Baele

Ranking
B+4/6 - 65 pts
Matches played
21 Last 6 months
Win rate
70% Last 10 matches
Best Performances
Ranking at the time: C15.2 (50)
Ranking at the time: C15.2 (50) · Seed B
Ranking at the time: C15.5 (35) · Seed D

Player matches

VICTORY

Round: Qualification quarter-final

6/1 6/3
vs Arthur Peeters C15.5 (35)
DEFEAT

Round: Qualification round of 16

6/3 7/6
vs Ian Otzipka C30.3 (15)
DEFEAT

Round: Qualification round of 16

6/4 1/6 7/5
vs Mathis Geers C15.4 (40) · Seed 3
VICTORY

Round: Qualification round of 32

6/1 6/4
vs Sander Ducastel C30.1 (25)
DEFEAT

Round: Final

3/6 6/4 6/3
vs René de Ridder C15.4 (40)
VICTORY

Round: Semi-final

6/0 4/6 6/2
vs Rik de Vriendt C30 (30)
VICTORY

Round: Quarter-final

6/2 2/6 6/3
vs Joren Robberecht C15.2 (50) · Seed 2
VICTORY

Round: Qualification quarter-final

6/4 6/0
vs Hugo Reyserhove C30.1 (25)

Enkeltornooi · 26 Jun 2025

ENKEL HEREN 4
DEFEAT

Round: Semi-final

4/6 7/5 6/0
vs Vince Dewae C15.2 (50)
VICTORY

Round: Quarter-final

6/3 6/2
vs Matis Duyshaver C15.3 (45) · Seed 4
VICTORY

Round: Qualification quarter-final

6/0 6/1
vs Nick Gerard C15.5 (35)
VICTORY

Round: Qualification round of 16

6/4 6/0
vs Kristof Verbeken C15.3 (45) · Seed 2
DEFEAT

Round: Semi-final

6/2 7/5
vs Louis Vanbockryck C15.2 (50)
VICTORY

Round: Quarter-final

3/6 6/3 6/4
vs Martinez Asdrubal Borbon C15.5 (35)
VICTORY

Round: Round of 16

1/6 6/3 6/2
vs Jan Matthijs C15.2 (50) · Seed 4
Showing 31-45 of 59 matches

Ranking and club history

Ranking and clubs evolution over time

B+4/6 Current 65 T.C. RACSO
C15.2 01/10/2025 50 KANGAROOS AALSTERSE T.C.
C15.5 01/05/2025 35 -
C30 01/10/2024 30 -
C30 01/05/2024 30 -
C15.5 01/10/2023 35 -
C30.2 01/05/2023 20 -
C30.2 01/10/2022 20 -
C30.3 01/05/2022 15 -
C30.3 01/10/2021 15 -
C30.2 01/10/2020 20 -
C30.3 01/10/2019 15 -
C30.5 01/12/2018 5 -
C30.3 01/10/2018 15 -
C30.5 01/01/2018 5 -
C30.5 01/01/2017 5 -
C30.5 01/01/2016 5 -
C30.5 01/01/2015 5 -
Is your data incorrect?
Let us know