🚧 Beta Version - Bugs may occur. Report an issue

Nathanaël Bruon

T.C. SAINT MARD Member since October 2023
Ranking
11.7 - 2 pts
Current points
12,69
Matches played
4 Last 6 months
Win rate
40% Last 10 matches
Best Performance
Jeunes Gens 11 REG 3 Upset
20/06/2026
Ranking at the time: 11.6 (3)

Player matches

T.C. SAINT MARD · 23 Jul 2026

Simples jeunes gens - 11 ans Grade 3
UPCOMING

Round: Pool A

30 July, 15:00
vs Alexandre Pestiaux 11.8 (1)

Building your prediction: stats, odds, and three voices...

Usually just a few seconds
UPCOMING

Round: Pool A

30 July, 14:00
vs Felix Reiter 11.7 (2)

Building your prediction: stats, odds, and three voices...

Usually just a few seconds
UPCOMING

Round: Pool A

30 July, 13:00
vs Romain Gondry 11.7 (2)

Building your prediction: stats, odds, and three voices...

Usually just a few seconds
DEFEAT

Round: Quarter-final

24 Jul · 15:00

4/2 1/4 4/3
vs Felix Reiter 11.7 (2)
DEFEAT

Round: Final

4/1 4/2
vs Pauline Demelenne 9.7 (2)
VICTORY

Round: Semi-final

4/2 4/1
vs Eden Iserentant 9.8 (1)
VICTORY

Round: Pool A

4/0
vs Tiago Nelisse 9.8 (1)
VICTORY

Round: Pool A

4/0
vs Lorenzo Nelisse 9.7 (2)

No match matches your search.

Interclubs matches

Win

Jeunes Gens 11 REG 3 · Round 5

Sat 20 Jun

3 0
Home · vs ARLON A (RTC Arlon)

Individual matches

V 4/3 4/2
Loss

Jeunes Gens 11 REG 3 · Round 4

Sat 13 Jun

0 3
Away · vs LIBRAMONT A (Tennis Club Libramont Chevigny)

Individual matches

D 4/2 4/2
Win

Jeunes Gens 11 REG 3 · Round 3

Sat 13 Jun

3 0
Home · vs NEUFCHATEAU A (Royal Tennis Club Neufchâteau)

Individual matches

V 4/0 4/2

No match matches your search.

Ranking and club history

Ranking and clubs evolution over time

11.7 Current 2 T.C. SAINT MARD
11.6 01/10/2025 3 T.C. SAINT MARD
9.6 01/05/2025 3 T.C. SAINT MARD
9.6 01/10/2024 3 T.C. SAINT MARD
9.8 01/05/2024 1 T.C. SAINT MARD
9.8 01/10/2023 1 T.C. SAINT MARD

Points history

How your points (cumulative ranking) changed over time.

29/06/2026 12,69 pts
16/05/2026 0,00 pts
16/11/2025 7,62 pts
Is your data incorrect?
Let us know