🚧 Beta Version - Bugs may occur. Report an issue

Anne Mernier

T.C. BAUDET BERTRIX Member since May 2025
Ranking
C30.5 - 5 pts
Current points
54,73
Matches played
3 Last 6 months
Win rate
56% Last 10 matches
Best Performances
Dames 40 REG 4 Upset
31/05/2026
Ranking at the time: C30.6 (3)
03/05/2026
Ranking at the time: C30.6 (3)
Dames 40 REG 4 Upset
07/06/2026
Ranking at the time: C30.6 (3)

Player matches

T.C. BAUDET BERTRIX · 30 Jul 2026

Simples Dames 40 4
UPCOMING

Round: Quarter-final

3 August, 13:30
vs Magali Cozier C30.5 (5)

Building your prediction: stats, odds, and three voices...

Usually just a few seconds

LIBRAMONT · 23 Apr 2026

Simples Dames 55 3
VICTORY

Round: Final

3 May · 09:00

6/1 6/3
vs Cathy Thomas C30.4 (10)
VICTORY

Round: Semi-final

6/0 6/0
vs Françoise Destoop C30.5 (5) · Seed 2

T.C. BAUDET BERTRIX · 12 Feb 2026

Simples Dames 5
DEFEAT

Round: Round of 16

7/5 6/1
vs Téhéva Plainchamp C30.4 (10)

R.T.C. NEUFCHATEAU · 7 Aug 2025

Simples Dames 40 4
DEFEAT

Round: Quarter-final

6/4 4/6 7/6
vs Murielle Seret C30.5 (5) · Seed 3

T.C. BAUDET BERTRIX · 31 Jul 2025

Simples Dames 40 4
DEFEAT

Round: Round of 16

6/4 6/4
vs Ines Merlin C30.6 (3)

No match matches your search.

Interclubs matches

Loss

Dames 40 REG 4 · Round 2

Sun 7 Jun

0 3
Home · vs BAYARD A (TC Bayard Dinantais)

Individual matches

V 2/6 6/0 7/6
Draw

Dames 40 REG 4 · Round 1

Sun 31 May

1.5 1.5
Away · vs FONTENALLE A (TC Fontenalle)

Individual matches

V 7/5 3/6 7/6
Win

Dames REG 7 · Round 3

Sat 9 May

3 0
Home · vs LE LAC A (T.C. LE LAC)

Individual matches

V 6/2 6/1

No match matches your search.

Ranking and club history

Ranking and clubs evolution over time

C30.5 Current 5 T.C. BAUDET BERTRIX
C30.6 01/10/2025 3 T.C. BAUDET BERTRIX
C30.6 01/05/2025 3 T.C. BAUDET BERTRIX
C30.6 01/10/2024 3 T.C. STABULOIS
C30.6 01/05/2024 3 T.C. STABULOIS

Points history

How your points (cumulative ranking) changed over time.

08/06/2026 54,73 pts
01/06/2026 49,55 pts
11/05/2026 39,13 pts
10/04/2026 0,00 pts
Is your data incorrect?
Let us know