🚧 Beta Version - Bugs may occur. Report an issue

Rosalie Pollyn

K. BRANDT T.C.
View on federation website
Ranking
C15.1 - 55 pts
Matches played
7 Last 6 months
Win rate
90% Last 10 matches
Best Performances
TC Stabroek Enkeltornooi & Tennis Tour Junior Upset
16/04/2026
ENKEL DAMES 3
Ranking at the time: C30 (30)
Louise de Vindt
C15.1 (55) · Seed 1
4/6 6/2 6/2
TC Stabroek Enkeltornooi & Tennis Tour Junior Upset
18/04/2026
ENKEL DAMES 3
Ranking at the time: C30 (30)
Evi Rans
C15.4 (40)
6/1 6/0
TC Stabroek Enkeltornooi & Tennis Tour Junior Upset
19/04/2026
ENKEL DAMES 3
Ranking at the time: C30 (30)
Pauline Convent
C15.5 (35)
6/0 6/0

Player matches

55ste Oesterij - Tennis Tour - Enkel - Belgian Circuit · 7 Aug 2026

ENKEL DAMES 3
DEFEAT

Round: Final

Walk-Over
vs Liesa Wils C15.2 (50)
VICTORY

Round: Semi-final

6/0 6/0
vs Evi Rans C15.3 (45)
VICTORY

Round: Quarter-final

6/0 6/0
vs Noa Leirs C15.3 (45)
ENKEL DAMES 2
DEFEAT

Round: Qualification quarter-final

2/6 6/3 6/1
vs Nathalie van den Broeck B+2/6 (70) · Seed 3

TC Stabroek Enkeltornooi & Tennis Tour Junior · 11 Apr 2026

ENKEL DAMES 3
VICTORY

Round: Final

19 Apr · 17:30

6/0 6/0
vs Pauline Convent C15.5 (35)
VICTORY

Round: Semi-final

18 Apr · 12:00

6/1 6/0
vs Evi Rans C15.4 (40)
VICTORY

Round: Quarter-final

16 Apr · 18:00

4/6 6/2 6/2
vs Louise de Vindt C15.1 (55) · Seed 1
VICTORY

Round: Round of 16

6/1 7/5
vs Victoria Nys C30 (30)
ENKEL DAMES 4
VICTORY

Round: Final

19 Apr · 10:00

6/4 6/2
vs Eline Todts C30 (30)
VICTORY

Round: Semi-final

18 Apr · 20:30

6/3 6/1
vs Elise de Busser C30.1 (25)
VICTORY

Round: Quarter-final

14 Apr · 18:00

6/1 6/0
vs Karin de Craecker C30.2 (20) · Seed D

No match matches your search.

Ranking and club history

Ranking and clubs evolution over time

C15.1 Current 55 K. BRANDT T.C.
C30 01/10/2025 30 K. BRANDT T.C.

Also discover

K. BRANDT T.C. club
All players and matches from the club
Players in Antwerp
The regional players ranking
Tournaments in Antwerp
Regional tournaments, upcoming and past
Is your data incorrect?
Let us know