🚧 Beta Version - Bugs may occur. Report an issue
Photo of Tijs van Oostenryck

Tijs van Oostenryck

Ranking
N/A - 85 pts
Matches played
2 Last 6 months
Win rate
30% Last 10 matches
Best Performance
26/06/2025
Ranking at the time: B-4/6 (85)

Player matches

DEFEAT

Round: Qualification quarter-final

6/2 6/2
vs Mattiz Bogaerts B-4/6 (85)
VICTORY

Round: Qualification round of 16

6/0 6/3
vs Noah Dainville B-2/6 (80)
DEFEAT

Round: Prekwalificatie_1/16e finale

6/4 6/1
vs Pim van Mele B-15.2 · 100 nr. 231 · Seed 10
VICTORY

Round: Prekwalificatie_1/32e finale

6/7 6/4 7/6
vs Maxime de Wilde B-4/6 (85)
DEFEAT

Round: Quarter-final

6/2 6/3
vs Tom Craenhals B-15 (90)
VICTORY

Round: Round of 16

6/7 6/4 6/0
vs Simon Messely B-4/6 (85) · Seed H
DEFEAT

Round: Qualification round of 32

6/1 7/6
vs Mateo Vergauwe B-15 (90)
DEFEAT

Round: Round of 16

6/0 6/4
vs Max Roland B-2/6 (80) · Seed F
DEFEAT

Round: Qualification 1st round

6/1 7/6
vs Mateo Vergauwe B-15 (90)
DEFEAT

Round: Qualification round of 16

6/4 3/6 6/4
vs Robbe Janssens B-15.1 (95)
DEFEAT

Round: Semi-final

3/6 7/5 6/1
vs Loic Wellens B-2/6 (80)
VICTORY

Round: Quarter-final

6/1 6/2
vs Steven White B0 (75) · Seed B
DEFEAT

Round: Qualification 1st round

6/4 3/6 6/4
vs Robbe Janssens B-15.1 (95)
DEFEAT

Round: Quarter-final

Walk-Over
vs Max Roland B-2/6 (80) · Seed C
DEFEAT

Round: Pre-qualification

5/7 7/6 6/2
vs Jens van Vlierberghe B-15.4 (105) · Seed 2
Showing 1-15 of 30 matches

Ranking and club history

Ranking and clubs evolution over time

B-4/6 01/10/2025 85 TC80
B-15 01/05/2025 90 -
B-15 01/10/2024 90 -
B-2/6 01/05/2024 80 -
B-2/6 01/10/2023 80 -
B-2/6 01/05/2023 80 -
B-4/6 01/10/2022 85 -
B-4/6 01/05/2022 85 -
B-4/6 01/10/2021 85 -
C15.1 01/10/2020 55 -
C15.2 01/10/2019 50 -
C30 01/12/2018 30 -
C15.3 01/10/2018 45 -
C30.2 01/01/2018 20 -
C30.4 01/01/2017 10 -
C30.4 01/01/2016 10 -
C30.5 01/01/2015 5 -
C30.5 01/01/2014 5 -
C30.5 01/01/2013 5 -
C30.5 01/01/2012 5 -
C30.5 01/01/2011 5 -
C30.5 01/01/2010 5 -
C30.5 01/01/2009 5 -
Is your data incorrect?
Let us know