🚧 Beta Version - Bugs may occur. Report an issue
Photo of Lucas van der Jeught

Lucas van der Jeught

Ranking
N/A - 65 pts
Matches played
3 Last 6 months
Win rate
80% Last 10 matches
Best Performance
Ranking at the time: C15.1 (55)

Player matches

VICTORY

Round: Final

6/0 6/1
vs Thibeau van Ostade C15.1 (55)
VICTORY

Round: Semi-final

6/1 6/0
vs Rutger Hofman C15 (60) · Seed 2
VICTORY

Round: Quarter-final

6/0 6/2
vs Sandro Bottaro C15.3 (45)
DEFEAT

Round: Semi-final

5/7 6/4 6/4
vs Noah van Hulle C15.2 (50)
VICTORY

Round: Quarter-final

7/6 6/2
vs René de Ridder C15.4 (40)
DEFEAT

Round: Qualification round of 16

6/3 6/3
vs Roman van Waeyenbergh C15 (60) · Seed 2
VICTORY

Round: Final

6/4 6/0
vs Kasper Huysentruyt C15.5 (35)
VICTORY

Round: Semi-final

6/1 6/1
vs Marnik de Ridder C15.4 (40)
VICTORY

Round: Quarter-final

6/3 6/4
vs Jasper Vanneste C30 (30) · Seed D
VICTORY

Round: Final

7/6 3/6 6/3
vs Emiel de Smedt C15.2 (50)
VICTORY

Round: Semi-final

6/0 6/2
vs Hamdi Karabulut C15.4 (40)
VICTORY

Round: Quarter-final

6/2 6/3
vs Lennert Heynderickx C30 (30) · Seed A
VICTORY

Round: Final

6/1 6/1
vs James Aerts C15.2 (50)
VICTORY

Round: Semi-final

6/1 6/1
vs Matthias Adriaens C15.2 (50)
VICTORY

Round: Quarter-final

6/2 6/1
vs Christophe Vercauteren C15.5 (35) · Seed D
Showing 1-15 of 18 matches

Ranking and club history

Ranking and clubs evolution over time

C15.1 01/10/2025 55 T.C. BECKHAND
C15.2 01/05/2025 50 -
C15.1 01/10/2024 55 -
C15.1 01/05/2024 55 -
C15.1 01/10/2023 55 -
C15 01/05/2023 60 -
C15 01/10/2022 60 -
C15 01/05/2022 60 -
B+4/6 01/10/2021 65 -
B+4/6 01/10/2020 65 -
C15 01/10/2019 60 -
C15.5 01/12/2018 35 -
C15.2 01/10/2018 50 -
C15.5 01/01/2018 35 -
C15.5 01/01/2017 35 -
C15.4 01/01/2016 40 -
C15.4 01/01/2015 40 -
C15.4 01/01/2014 40 -
C15.3 01/01/2013 45 -
C15.3 01/01/2012 45 -
C15.3 01/01/2011 45 -
C15.3 01/01/2010 45 -
C15.2 01/01/2009 50 -
C15.1 01/01/2008 55 -
C15.1 01/01/2007 55 -
C30 01/01/2006 30 -
C30.2 01/01/2005 20 -
C30.4 01/01/2004 10 -
C30.4 01/01/2003 10 -
Is your data incorrect?
Let us know