🚧 Beta Version - Bugs may occur. Report an issue
Photo of Rik Keersmaekers

Rik Keersmaekers

Ranking
C15.2 - 50 pts
Matches played
0 Last 6 months
Win rate
50% Last 10 matches
Best Performances

Player matches

RTC DE BEMPDEKENS · 17 Nov 2025

ENKEL HEREN 4
DEFEAT

Round: Final

6/2 6/2
vs Rowen Moreau C15.3 (45)
VICTORY

Round: Semi-final

1/6 6/2 10/8
vs Lars van den Broeck C15.3 (45)
VICTORY

Round: Quarter-final

6/1 6/2
vs Olivier Lauwers C15.5 (35)
DEFEAT

Round: Qualification round of 16

Walk-Over
vs Olivier Lauwers C15.5 (35)
DEFEAT

Round: Qualification round of 16

Walk-Over
vs Lucas Stijnen C30 (30)
DEFEAT

Round: Semi-final

7/6 6/0
vs Joppe Maerien C15.2 (50)
VICTORY

Round: Quarter-final

6/2 6/4
vs Lewis Cornelissen C15.4 (40)
DEFEAT

Round: Semi-final

6/4 2/6 6/0
vs James Aerts C15.2 (50)
VICTORY

Round: Quarter-final

6/2 6/2
vs Luca Huysmans C15.3 (45) · Seed 4
VICTORY

Round: Qualification quarter-final

6/4 6/2
vs Quinten Dekort C30.1 (25)
DEFEAT

Round: Semi-final

6/7 6/3 6/1
vs Senna Hemelaers C15.2 (50)
VICTORY

Round: Quarter-final

6/4 6/1
vs Jef Vanhoof C15.3 (45) · Seed 4
VICTORY

Round: Qualification quarter-final

6/1 6/3
vs Rafael Caers C15.4 (40) · Seed 4
VICTORY

Round: Qualification round of 16

6/2 6/0
vs Tom Meysen C30 (30)
DEFEAT

Round: Semi-final

6/2 6/7 6/4
vs Thomas Maurin C15.3 (45)
Showing 1-15 of 22 matches

Ranking and club history

Ranking and clubs evolution over time

C15.2 Current 50 RTC DE BEMPDEKENS
C15.2 01/10/2025 50 RTC DE BEMPDEKENS
C15.5 01/05/2025 35 -
C30 01/10/2024 30 -
C30.1 01/05/2024 25 -
C30.3 01/10/2023 15 -
C30.4 01/05/2023 10 -
C30.3 01/10/2022 15 -
C30.3 01/05/2022 15 -
C30.3 01/10/2021 15 -
C30.2 01/10/2020 20 -
C30.1 01/10/2019 25 -
C30.2 01/12/2018 20 -
C30 01/10/2018 30 -
C30.2 01/01/2018 20 -
C30.2 01/01/2017 20 -
C30.2 01/01/2016 20 -
C30.1 01/01/2015 25 -
C30.3 01/01/2014 15 -
C30.3 01/01/2013 15 -
C30.4 01/01/2012 10 -
C30.5 01/01/2011 5 -
C30.5 01/01/2010 5 -
C30.5 01/01/2009 5 -
C30.5 01/01/2008 5 -
C30.5 01/01/2007 5 -
Is your data incorrect?
Let us know