🚧 Beta Version - Bugs may occur. Report an issue
Photo of Jean-Marie Gobert

Jean-Marie Gobert

TIEBREAK Member since October 1998
Ranking
C30.5 - 5 pts
Current points
26,88
Matches played
10 Last 6 months
Win rate
10% Last 10 matches

Player matches

VICTORY

Round: Quarter-final

3/6 7/5 7/6
vs Bernard Lebecq C30.5 (5)
DEFEAT

Round: Semi-final

6/4 6/1
vs Salvatore Salamone C30 (30) · Seed 1
VICTORY

Round: Quarter-final

6/2 4/6 7/6
vs Carl Paternot C30.5 (5)
DEFEAT

Round: Quarter-final

6/1 6/2
vs Blaise Poutoum Lobe C30.4 (10) · Seed 1
DEFEAT

Round: Final

7/5 4/6 7/6
vs Guy Pierard C30.5 (5)
VICTORY

Round: Semi-final

6/3 7/5
vs Giorgio Morico C30.5 (5)
DEFEAT

Round: Round of 16

6/4 6/3
vs Pascal Lorenzetti C30.5 (5)
DEFEAT

Round: Semi-final

6/4 6/3
vs Dany Stalpaert C30.4 (10) · Seed 1
VICTORY

Round: Quarter-final

6/4 6/4
vs Yves Filee C30.5 (5)
Showing 31-39 of 39 matches

Ranking and club history

Ranking and clubs evolution over time

C30.5 Current 5 TIEBREAK
C30.4 01/10/2025 10 TIEBREAK
C30.5 01/05/2025 5 TIEBREAK
C30.5 01/10/2024 5 TIEBREAK
C30.5 01/05/2024 5 TIEBREAK
C30.5 01/10/2023 5 TIEBREAK
C30.5 01/05/2023 5 TIEBREAK
C30.5 01/10/2022 5 TIEBREAK
C30.6 01/05/2022 3 TIEBREAK
C30.6 01/10/2021 3 TIEBREAK
C30.6 01/10/2020 3 TIEBREAK
C30.6 01/10/2019 3 TIEBREAK
C30.6 01/10/2018 3 TIEBREAK
NC 01/10/2017 1 TIEBREAK
NC 01/10/2016 1 TIEBREAK
C30.5 01/10/2015 5 TIEBREAK
C30.5 01/10/2014 5 TIEBREAK
C30.4 01/10/2013 10 TIEBREAK
C30.4 01/10/2012 10 TIEBREAK
C30.4 01/10/2011 10 TIEBREAK
C30.3 01/10/2010 15 TIEBREAK
C30.3 01/10/2009 15 TIEBREAK
C30.3 01/10/2008 15 TIEBREAK
C30.2 01/10/2007 20 TIEBREAK
C30.2 01/10/2006 20 TIEBREAK
C30.2 01/10/2005 20 TIEBREAK
C30.2 01/10/2004 20 TIEBREAK
C30.2 01/10/2003 20 TIEBREAK
C30.2 01/10/2002 20 TIEBREAK
C30.2 01/10/2001 20 TIEBREAK
C30.4 01/10/2000 10 TIEBREAK
C30.4 01/10/1999 10 TIEBREAK
C30.4 01/10/1998 10 TIEBREAK

Points history

How your points (cumulative ranking) changed over time.

14/05/2026 26,88 pts
08/04/2026 41,26 pts
13/11/2025 40,76 pts
Is your data incorrect?
Let us know