🚧 Beta Version - Bugs may occur. Report an issue
Photo of Thomas Waeyaert

Thomas Waeyaert

Ranking
C15.3 - 45 pts
Matches played
8 Last 6 months
Win rate
50% Last 10 matches
Best Performances
14/02/2026
Ranking at the time: C15.5 (35) · Seed C
Ranking at the time: C15.5 (35)
Ranking at the time: C15.5 (35)

Player matches

TS KENTA · 1 Apr 2026

ENKEL HEREN 4
DEFEAT

Round: Qualification round of 16

4 Apr · 10:00

6/2 6/1
vs Kris Sergeant C15.5 (35)

Krokustornooi · 14 Feb 2026

ENKEL HEREN 4
DEFEAT

Round: Semi-final

6/7 6/3 6/3
vs Mattis Baele C15.2 (50)
VICTORY

Round: Quarter-final

7/6 3/6 3/1
vs Simon de Backer C15.3 (45) · Seed 4
VICTORY

Round: Qualification quarter-final

6/3 6/0
vs Casper Beel C15.5 (35) · Seed 4
VICTORY

Round: Qualification round of 16

6/1 6/1
vs César Vanbockryck C30 (30)
DEFEAT

Round: Quarter-final

6/1 1/6 6/2
vs Kamiel Heeren C15.2 (50) · Seed 2
VICTORY

Round: Qualification quarter-final

7/6 6/1
vs Elias Ryckaert C15.4 (40)
VICTORY

Round: Qualification round of 16

3/6 7/6 6/4
vs Matin Muylle C15.4 (40) · Seed 3
DEFEAT

Round: Qualification round of 32

6/1 4/6 6/2
vs Sandro Bottaro C30 (30)
DEFEAT

Round: Qualification round of 16

5/7 6/1 6/1
vs Lorens Ghita C15.4 (40)
DEFEAT

Round: Quarter-final

6/1 6/1
vs Brecht van Hoorde C15.2 (50) · Seed 1
VICTORY

Round: Qualification quarter-final

6/4 1/6 6/4
vs Finn Moors C15.4 (40) · Seed 2
DEFEAT

Round: Qualification quarter-final

6/1 6/1
vs Rik de Vriendt C30 (30)
DEFEAT

Round: Semi-final

6/2 6/3
vs Nick Gerard C30.2 (20)
VICTORY

Round: Quarter-final

6/4 2/6 6/4
vs Binke Verbeken C30.1 (25) · Seed C
Showing 1-15 of 21 matches

Ranking and club history

Ranking and clubs evolution over time

C15.3 Current 45 T.C. RACSO
C15.5 01/05/2025 35 -
C30 01/10/2024 30 -
C30.3 01/05/2024 15 -
C30.3 01/10/2023 15 -
C30.5 01/05/2023 5 -
C30.5 01/10/2022 5 -
C30.5 01/05/2022 5 -
13.8 01/10/2021 1 -
13.8 01/10/2020 1 -
11.7 01/10/2019 2 -
C30.5 01/12/2018 5 -
11.8 01/10/2018 1 -
C30.5 01/01/2018 5 -
C30.5 01/01/2017 5 -
Is your data incorrect?
Let us know