🚧 Beta Version - Bugs may occur. Report an issue
Photo of Alexis Vantomme

Alexis Vantomme

LEROEULX Member since October 2019
Ranking
C30.5 - 5 pts
Current points
39,00
Matches played
4 Last 6 months
Win rate
80% Last 10 matches
Best Performances
03/07/2025
Ranking at the time: 13.7 (2)
03/07/2025
Ranking at the time: 13.7 (2)
03/07/2025
Ranking at the time: 13.7 (2)

Player matches

DEFEAT

Round: Quarter-final

6/2 6/1
vs Arthur Delrue C30.1 (25) · Seed 1
DEFEAT

Round: Final

6/4 6/4
vs Louis Bourlard Lion C30.5 (5)
VICTORY

Round: Semi-final

6/2 6/3
vs Arthur Zych C30.6 (3)
VICTORY

Round: Quarter-final

6/2 6/4
vs Grégoire Dubois C30.6 (3)
DEFEAT

Round: Qualification 2nd round

6/7 6/4 6/3
vs Maximilien Anthoon 13.4 (10) · Seed 1
VICTORY

Round: Qualification 1st round

6/3 3/6 7/5
vs Tom Mercier 13.8 (1)
VICTORY

Round: Final

3/6 6/3 7/5
vs Tom Mercier 13.8 (1)
VICTORY

Round: Semi-final

6/4 6/0
vs Yanis Mounir 13.6 (3)
VICTORY

Round: Pool A

6/1
vs Robin de Biourge 13.6 (3)
VICTORY

Round: Pool A

6/0
vs Rafael Wathelet 13.6 (3)
VICTORY

Round: Pool A

6/0
vs Martin Vanoverberghe 13.8 (1)

Interclubs matches

Win

Jeunes Gens 15 REG 3 · Round 4

Sat 23 May

2 1
Away · vs SENEFFE A (SENEFFE)

Individual matches

V
Zachary Liem C30.6
6/0 6/1
Win

Jeunes Gens 15 REG 3 · Round 2

Sat 25 Apr

3 0
Away · vs SONEGIEN B (SONEGIEN)

Individual matches

V 6/1 6/0
Loss

Jeunes Gens 15 REG 3 · Round 1

Sat 18 Apr

0 3
Away · vs R.T.C. NIMY A (R.T.C. NIMY)

Individual matches

V 6/1 6/1

Ranking and club history

Ranking and clubs evolution over time

C30.5 Current 5 LEROEULX
C30.5 01/10/2025 5 LEROEULX
13.7 01/05/2025 2 LEROEULX
13.8 01/10/2024 1 LEROEULX
13.8 01/05/2024 1 LEROEULX
13.8 01/10/2023 1 LEROEULX
11.8 01/05/2023 1 LEROEULX
11.8 01/10/2022 1 LEROEULX
11.8 01/05/2022 1 LEROEULX
11.8 01/10/2021 1 LEROEULX
9.8 01/10/2020 1 LEROEULX
9.8 01/10/2019 1 LEROEULX

Points history

How your points (cumulative ranking) changed over time.

14/05/2026 39,00 pts
10/04/2026 32,95 pts
14/11/2025 24,05 pts
Is your data incorrect?
Let us know