🚧 Beta Version - Bugs may occur. Report an issue
Photo of Alexandre Reginster

Alexandre Reginster

T.C. BEAUFAYS Member since October 2019
Ranking
C15.3 - 45 pts
Current points
223,04
Matches played
2 Last 6 months
Win rate
50% Last 10 matches

Player matches

DEFEAT

Round: Round of 16

W.O.
vs Anthony Pineda C15.3 (45)
DEFEAT

Round: Round of 16

7/5 7/6
vs Mathieu Delvaux C15.5 (35)

Interclubs matches

Win

Messieurs REG 2 · Round 3

Thu 14 May

3 0
Home · vs MARMOTTE A (T.C. LA MARMOTTE)

Individual matches

V 6/0 4/6 6/4
Loss

Messieurs REG 4 · Round 1

Sun 26 Apr

0 3
Away · vs WAIMES A (T.C. WAIMES)

Individual matches

V 6/0 6/4

Ranking and club history

Ranking and clubs evolution over time

C15.3 Current 45 T.C. BEAUFAYS
C15.3 01/10/2025 45 T.C. BEAUFAYS
C15.2 01/05/2025 50 T.C. BEAUFAYS
C15.3 01/10/2024 45 T.C. BEAUFAYS
C15.5 01/05/2024 35 T.C. BEAUFAYS
C15.4 01/10/2023 40 T.C. BEAUFAYS
C15.4 01/05/2023 40 T.C. BEAUFAYS
C15.3 01/10/2022 45 T.C. BEAUFAYS
C15.3 01/05/2022 45 T.C. BEAUFAYS
C15.5 01/10/2021 35 T.C. BEAUFAYS
C30.1 01/10/2020 25 T.C. BEAUFAYS
C30.1 01/10/2019 25 T.C. BEAUFAYS
C30.2 01/10/2018 20 R.F.C. LIEGEOIS
C30.3 01/10/2017 15 R.F.C. LIEGEOIS
C30.3 01/10/2016 15 R.F.C. LIEGEOIS
C30.3 01/10/2015 15 R.F.C. LIEGEOIS
C30.4 01/10/2014 10 R.F.C. LIEGEOIS
C30.4 01/10/2013 10 R.F.C. LIEGEOIS
C30.4 01/10/2012 10 R.F.C. LIEGEOIS
C30.4 01/10/2011 10 R.T.C. BAUDOUIN (Liège)
C30.4 01/10/2010 10 R.T.C. BAUDOUIN (Liège)
C30.3 01/10/2009 15 R.T.C. BAUDOUIN (Liège)
C30.3 01/10/2008 15 R.T.C. BAUDOUIN (Liège)
C30.3 01/10/2007 15 R.T.C. BAUDOUIN (Liège)
C30.2 01/10/2006 20 R.T.C. BAUDOUIN (Liège)
C30.2 01/10/2005 20 R.T.C. BAUDOUIN (Liège)
C30.2 01/10/2004 20 R.T.C. BAUDOUIN (Liège)
C30.2 01/10/2003 20 R.T.C. BAUDOUIN (Liège)
C30.2 01/10/2002 20 R.T.C. BAUDOUIN (Liège)
C30.4 01/10/2001 10 R.T.C. BAUDOUIN (Liège)
C30.4 01/10/2000 10 R.T.C. BAUDOUIN (Liège)

Points history

How your points (cumulative ranking) changed over time.

14/05/2026 223,04 pts
07/04/2026 151,04 pts
20/11/2025 149,44 pts
Is your data incorrect?
Let us know