🚧 Beta Version - Bugs may occur. Report an issue
Photo of Téo Destexhe

Téo Destexhe

WAREMMIEN Member since October 2013
Ranking
B-4/6 - 85 pts
Current points
0,00
Matches played
0 Last 6 months
Win rate
40% Last 10 matches
Best Performance
20/02/2025
Ranking at the time: B-15 (90)

Player matches

DEFEAT

Round: Quarter-final

6/2 6/3
vs Louis Mercenier B-4/6 (85)
DEFEAT

Round: Qualification 1st round

6/2 6/1
vs Baptiste Longueville B-4/6 (85)
DEFEAT

Round: Semi-final

6/4 6/1
vs Rafael Geurten B-15 (90)
VICTORY

Round: Quarter-final

6/6 6/3
vs Pierre Thomas B-2/6 (80)
DEFEAT

Round: Pre-qualification

6/3 6/1
vs Max Quennery B-15.1 (95)
VICTORY

Round: Pre-qualification 1st round

6/3 6/3
vs Guillaume van Eyll B-4/6 (85)
DEFEAT

Round: Round of 16

6/4 6/2
vs Antoine Hasse B-15.2 (100) · Seed 6
VICTORY

Round: Last round of qualification

7/5 2/6 6/2
vs Guillaume Defrang B-15.1 (95) · Seed 8
VICTORY

Round: Pre-qualification

6/4 6/3
vs Antoine Maury B-15 (90) · Seed 4
DEFEAT

Round: Last round of qualification

1/0
vs Gabriel Frippiat B-2/6 (80)
DEFEAT

Round: Final

7/5 6/2
vs Arthur Adant B-2/6 (80)
VICTORY

Round: Semi-final

4/6 6/2 6/1
vs François Docquier B-15 (90)
VICTORY

Round: Quarter-final

6/2 6/0
vs Simon Royer B-4/6 (85)
VICTORY

Round: Round of 16

6/2 6/1
vs Théodore Verburgh B-2/6 (80)

Ranking and club history

Ranking and clubs evolution over time

B-4/6 Current 85 WAREMMIEN
B-4/6 01/10/2025 85 WAREMMIEN
B-15 01/05/2025 90 WAREMMIEN
B-15 01/10/2024 90 WAREMMIEN
B-4/6 01/05/2024 85 WAREMMIEN
B-4/6 01/10/2023 85 WAREMMIEN
B-2/6 01/05/2023 80 WAREMMIEN
B+4/6 01/10/2022 65 WAREMMIEN
B+2/6 01/05/2022 70 WAREMMIEN
B+2/6 01/10/2021 70 WAREMMIEN
C15.3 01/10/2020 45 WAREMMIEN
13.1 01/10/2019 25 WAREMMIEN
13.1 01/10/2018 25 WAREMMIEN
C30.5 01/10/2017 5 WAREMMIEN
C30.5 01/10/2016 5 WAREMMIEN
NC 01/10/2015 1 WAREMMIEN
NC 01/10/2014 1 WAREMMIEN
NC 01/10/2013 1 WAREMMIEN

Points history

How your points (cumulative ranking) changed over time.

15/05/2026 0,00 pts
01/11/2025 849,40 pts
Is your data incorrect?
Let us know