🚧 Beta Version - Bugs may occur. Report an issue

Camille Bottin

Royal Tennis Club Visé Member since October 2023
Ranking
C30.1 - 25 pts
Current points
0,00
Matches played
0 Last 6 months
Win rate
10% Last 10 matches

Player matches

RGF TENNIS · 4 Sep 2025

Simples Dames 25 3
DEFEAT

Round: Quarter-final

1/6 6/4 7/6
vs Lara Pirottin C30.1 (25)

T.C. SMASH 51 · 14 Aug 2025

Simples Dames 25 3
DEFEAT

Round: Quarter-final

4/6 6/4 6/2
vs Florence Bonjean C30.3 (15)

T.C. RICHELLOIS · 7 Aug 2025

Simples Dames 25 3
DEFEAT

Round: Round of 16

6/7 6/3 6/0
vs Genevieve Frisschen C30.4 (10)

R.T.C. VISE · 17 Jul 2025

Simples Dames 4
DEFEAT

Round: Final

1/6 7/5 7/5
vs Clara Moes C30.3 (15)
VICTORY

Round: Semi-final

7/5 6/3
vs Severine Leurquin C30.3 (15) · Seed 2

T.C. BELLE FLEUR · 10 Jul 2025

Simples Dames 4
DEFEAT

Round: Quarter-final

6/1 6/1
vs Manon Klippert C30 (30) · Seed 2

No match matches your search.

Interclubs matches

Win

Dames 25 REG 4 · Round 4

Sun 21 Jun

3 0
Home · vs TENNISSIMO C (T.C. TENNISSIMO)

Individual matches

D 6/1 3/6 6/2
Win

Dames REG 6 · Round 5

Mon 25 May

2 1
Home · vs BOMAL A (R.T.C. BOMAL)

Individual matches

D 6/4 6/1
Loss

Dames REG 6 · Round 3

Sat 16 May

0 3
Away · vs LADRIE A (T.C. LADRIE)

Individual matches

D 6/0 6/0
Win

Dames REG 6 · Round 2

Sat 9 May

2 1
Home · vs ESNEUX A (TC Esneux)

Individual matches

D 6/4 6/7 6/1
Win

Dames REG 6 · Round 1

Sat 25 Apr

2 1
Away · vs THEUX B (R. THEUX T.C.)

Individual matches

D 6/3 6/2

No match matches your search.

Ranking and club history

Ranking and clubs evolution over time

C30.1 Current 25 Royal Tennis Club Visé
C30.1 01/10/2025 25 Royal Tennis Club Visé
C30.3 01/05/2025 15 Royal Tennis Club Visé
C30.3 01/10/2024 15 Royal Tennis Club Visé
C30.4 01/05/2024 10 Royal Tennis Club Visé
C30.4 01/10/2023 10 Royal Tennis Club Visé
C30.6 01/10/2020 3 HOUSSE T.C.
C30.6 01/10/2019 3 T.C. HERVE

Points history

How your points (cumulative ranking) changed over time.

15/05/2026 0,00 pts
14/11/2025 97,44 pts
Is your data incorrect?
Let us know