🚧 Beta Version - Bugs may occur. Report an issue
Photo of Eline de Vocht

Eline de Vocht

Ranking
N/A - 60 pts
Matches played
8 Last 6 months
Win rate
50% Last 10 matches
Best Performances
Ranking at the time: C15.3 (45) · Seed B
Ranking at the time: C15.3 (45)

Player matches

T.C. HEIVELD · 10 Apr 2026

ENKEL DAMES 2
DEFEAT

Round: Qualification quarter-final

14 Apr · 17:00

6/0 7/5
vs June Ronken B+4/6 (65)

T.C. HEIVELD · 10 Apr 2026

ENKEL DAMES 3
DEFEAT

Round: Quarter-final

15 Apr · 17:00

6/3 6/2
vs Charlize Philips C15.1 (55) · Seed A
DEFEAT

Round: Semi-final

6/2 6/3
vs Alexia Creemers C30 (30)
VICTORY

Round: Quarter-final

7/6 6/2
vs Janelle Uwizeyemungu C30 (30)

Kersttoernooi · 20 Dec 2025

ENKEL DAMES 2
DEFEAT

Round: Quarter-final

6/2 3/6 7/6
vs Amber Langendries B+2/6 (70)

Kersttoernooi · 20 Dec 2025

ENKEL DAMES 3
VICTORY

Round: Final

6/4 6/2
vs Marie-Laure Vandenhaute C15.3 (45)
VICTORY

Round: Semi-final

6/4 6/4
vs Charlize Philips C15.1 (55)
VICTORY

Round: Quarter-final

6/2 6/1
vs Fee Schoevaerts C15.4 (40)
DEFEAT

Round: Semi-final

4/6 6/2 6/3
vs Ziyue Tang C15.4 (40)
VICTORY

Round: Quarter-final

6/4 6/2
vs Louise de Blauwe C15.5 (35) · Seed D
DEFEAT

Round: Final

6/2 6/2
vs Helena de Bodt C15.1 (55)
VICTORY

Round: Semi-final

6/4 3/6 6/1
vs Sarah Maleve C15.1 (55)
VICTORY

Round: Quarter-final

6/2 6/0
vs Sarah Bekambo C15.3 (45)
DEFEAT

Round: Semi-final

4/6 6/1 6/2
vs Céline Heymans C15.1 (55)
VICTORY

Round: Quarter-final

6/2 3/0
vs Lore Vandersanden C15 (60) · Seed 2
Showing 1-15 of 36 matches

Ranking and club history

Ranking and clubs evolution over time

C15.1 01/10/2025 55 PARK 1800
C15.3 01/05/2025 45 -
C30 01/10/2024 30 -
C30.2 01/05/2024 20 -
C30.4 01/10/2023 10 -
C30.5 01/05/2023 5 -
C30.6 01/10/2022 3 -
C30.6 01/05/2022 3 -
C30.6 01/10/2021 3 -
13.7 01/10/2020 2 -
11.7 01/10/2019 2 -
C30.5 01/12/2018 5 -
11.8 01/10/2018 1 -
C30.5 01/01/2018 5 -
C30.5 01/01/2017 5 -
C30.5 01/01/2016 5 -
C30.5 01/01/2015 5 -
C30.5 01/01/2014 5 -
C30.5 01/01/2013 5 -
Is your data incorrect?
Let us know