🚧 Beta Version - Bugs may occur. Report an issue

Michel Mathieu

T.C. GRAND OHEY Member since October 2021
Ranking
C30.5 - 5 pts
Current points
26,88
Matches played
0 Last 6 months
Win rate
67% Last 10 matches

Player matches

No tournament match

This player has no match recorded from tournaments under Tennis Vlaanderen and Tennis Wallonie-Bruxelles since early 2025.

No match matches your search.

Interclubs matches

Loss

Messieurs 50 REG 3 · Round 2

Sat 6 Jun

0.5 2.5
Away · vs BERTRIX A (T.C. BAUDET BERTRIX)

Individual matches

V
Eric Cirri C30.5
2/6 4/3
Loss

Messieurs 50 REG 3 · Round 1

Sat 30 May

0.5 2.5
Away · vs NASSOGNE A (TC Nassogne)

Individual matches

D
Vincent Rase C30.5
6/2 6/1

No match matches your search.

Ranking and club history

Ranking and clubs evolution over time

C30.5 Current 5 T.C. GRAND OHEY
C30.5 01/10/2025 5 T.C. GRAND OHEY
C30.5 01/05/2025 5 T.C. GRAND OHEY
C30.5 01/10/2024 5 T.C. GRAND OHEY
C30.5 01/05/2024 5 T.C. GRAND OHEY
C30.5 01/10/2023 5 T.C. GRAND OHEY
C30.5 01/05/2023 5 T.C. GRAND OHEY
C30.4 01/10/2022 10 T.C. GRAND OHEY
C30.5 01/05/2022 5 T.C. GRAND OHEY
C30.5 01/10/2021 5 T.C. GRAND OHEY
C30.5 01/10/2020 5 TC Fontenalle
C30.5 01/10/2019 5 TC Fontenalle
C30.6 01/10/2018 3 TC Fontenalle
C30.5 01/10/2017 5 TC Fontenalle
C30.5 01/10/2016 5 TC Fontenalle
C30.4 01/10/2015 10 TC Fontenalle
C30.4 01/10/2014 10 TC Fontenalle
C30.4 01/10/2013 10 TC Fontenalle
C30.5 01/10/2012 5 TC Fontenalle
C30.5 01/10/2011 5 TC Fontenalle
C30.5 01/10/2010 5 TC Fontenalle
NC 01/10/2009 1 TC Fontenalle
NC 01/10/2008 1 TC Fontenalle
NC 01/10/2007 1 TC Fontenalle
NC 01/10/2006 1 TC Fontenalle
NC 01/10/2005 1 TC Fontenalle
NC 01/10/2004 1 TC Fontenalle
NC 01/10/2003 1 TC Fontenalle
NC 01/10/2002 1 TC Fontenalle
NC 01/10/2001 1 TC Fontenalle
NC 01/10/2000 1 TC Fontenalle
NC 01/10/1999 1 TC Fontenalle
NC 01/10/1998 1 TC Fontenalle

Points history

How your points (cumulative ranking) changed over time.

29/06/2026 26,88 pts
08/06/2026 21,60 pts
15/05/2026 0,00 pts
01/11/2025 36,00 pts
Is your data incorrect?
Let us know