🚧 Beta Version - Bugs may occur. Report an issue
Photo of Philippe Vanderschueren

Philippe Vanderschueren

BAUDOUIN (Brabant) Member since October 1998
Ranking
C15.4 - 40 pts
Current points
0,00
Matches played
0 Last 6 months
Win rate
50% Last 10 matches

Player matches

DEFEAT

Round: Quarter-final

6/1 6/2
vs Geoffroy Beaujean C15.2 (50) · Seed 1
DEFEAT

Round: Quarter-final

4/3
vs Noah Coenen C15.2 (50) · Seed 3
VICTORY

Round: Last round of qualification

6/2 6/1
vs Julien Devuyst C30.1 (25)
VICTORY

Round: Qualification 1st round

6/1 6/2
vs Arnaud Vandenplas C15.4 (40)

Ranking and club history

Ranking and clubs evolution over time

C15.4 Current 40 BAUDOUIN (Brabant)
C15.4 01/10/2025 40 BAUDOUIN (Brabant)
C15.4 01/05/2025 40 BAUDOUIN (Brabant)
C15.4 01/10/2024 40 BAUDOUIN (Brabant)
C15.3 01/05/2024 45 BAUDOUIN (Brabant)
C15.3 01/10/2023 45 BAUDOUIN (Brabant)
C15.3 01/05/2023 45 BAUDOUIN (Brabant)
C15.2 01/10/2022 50 BAUDOUIN (Brabant)
C15.2 01/05/2022 50 BAUDOUIN (Brabant)
C15.2 01/10/2021 50 BAUDOUIN (Brabant)
C15.1 01/10/2020 55 BAUDOUIN (Brabant)
C15 01/10/2019 60 BAUDOUIN (Brabant)
C15 01/10/2018 60 BAUDOUIN (Brabant)
C15.1 01/10/2017 55 BAUDOUIN (Brabant)
C15 01/10/2016 60 BAUDOUIN (Brabant)
C15 01/10/2015 60 BAUDOUIN (Brabant)
B+4/6 01/10/2014 65 BAUDOUIN (Brabant)
B+4/6 01/10/2013 65 BAUDOUIN (Brabant)
B+4/6 01/10/2012 65 BAUDOUIN (Brabant)
B+4/6 01/10/2011 65 BAUDOUIN (Brabant)
B+4/6 01/10/2010 65 BAUDOUIN (Brabant)
B+4/6 01/10/2009 65 BAUDOUIN (Brabant)
B+2/6 01/10/2008 70 BAUDOUIN (Brabant)
B+2/6 01/10/2007 70 BAUDOUIN (Brabant)
B+2/6 01/10/2006 70 BAUDOUIN (Brabant)
B+2/6 01/10/2005 70 BAUDOUIN (Brabant)
B+2/6 01/10/2004 70 BAUDOUIN (Brabant)
B0 01/10/2003 75 BAUDOUIN (Brabant)
B0 01/10/2002 75 BAUDOUIN (Brabant)
B0 01/10/2001 75 BAUDOUIN (Brabant)
B-2/6 01/10/2000 80 BAUDOUIN (Brabant)
B-2/6 01/10/1999 80 BAUDOUIN (Brabant)
B-2/6 01/10/1998 80 BAUDOUIN (Brabant)

Points history

How your points (cumulative ranking) changed over time.

12/05/2026 0,00 pts
07/11/2025 183,20 pts
Is your data incorrect?
Let us know