🚧 Beta Version - Bugs may occur. Report an issue
Photo of Guillaume Lacave

Guillaume Lacave

STABULOIS Member since October 2023
Ranking
C30.2 - 20 pts
Current points
0,00
Matches played
0 Last 6 months
Win rate
80% Last 10 matches
Best Performances
31/07/2025
Ranking at the time: C30.5 (5)
14/08/2025
Ranking at the time: C30.5 (5)

Player matches

VICTORY

Round: Final

7/6 7/5
vs Baptiste Roy C30.5 (5)
VICTORY

Round: Semi-final

6/3 6/4
vs Thibault Marichal C30.4 (10)
VICTORY

Round: Quarter-final

7/5 2/6 6/4
vs Neo Mathieu C30.5 (5)
VICTORY

Round: Round of 16

4/6 6/4 6/2
vs Francois Delperdange C30.6 (3)
VICTORY

Round: 1st round

6/2 6/2
vs Frank Hartman C30.5 (5) · Seed 5
DEFEAT

Round: Semi-final

5/7 7/5 6/2
vs Henri Donneaux C30.4 (10)
VICTORY

Round: Quarter-final

6/3 6/4
vs Arthur Petrement C30.4 (10)
VICTORY

Round: Round of 16

6/0 6/2
vs Justin Legros C30.5 (5)
VICTORY

Round: 1st round

6/1 6/2
vs Adrien Capon C30.4 (10) · Seed 4
DEFEAT

Round: Quarter-final

6/3 4/6 6/4
vs Christopher Jacquemin C30.4 (10)
VICTORY

Round: Round of 16

6/3 6/1
vs Aaron Thomas C30.4 (10) · Seed 7
VICTORY

Round: 1st round

6/1 6/2
vs François Antoine C30.5 (5)

Ranking and club history

Ranking and clubs evolution over time

C30.2 Current 20 STABULOIS
C30.2 01/10/2025 20 STABULOIS
C30.5 01/05/2025 5 STABULOIS
C30.5 01/10/2024 5 STABULOIS
C30.5 01/05/2024 5 STABULOIS
C30.5 01/10/2023 5 STABULOIS
C30.5 01/05/2023 5 MARCHE
C30.4 01/10/2022 10 MARCHE
C30.4 01/05/2022 10 MARCHE
C30.4 01/10/2021 10 MARCHE
C30.3 01/10/2020 15 MARCHE
C30.2 01/10/2019 20 MARCHE
C30.2 01/10/2018 20 MARCHE
C30.2 01/10/2017 20 MARCHE
C30.1 01/10/2016 25 MARCHE
C30.1 01/10/2015 25 MARCHE
C30.1 01/10/2014 25 MARCHE
C30.1 01/10/2013 25 MARCHE
C30.1 01/10/2012 25 MARCHE
C30.3 01/10/2011 15 MARCHE
C30.4 01/10/2010 10 MARCHE
C30.5 01/10/2009 5 MARCHE
C30.5 01/10/2008 5 MARCHE
NC 01/10/2007 1 MARCHE
NC 01/10/2006 1 MARCHE

Points history

How your points (cumulative ranking) changed over time.

15/05/2026 0,00 pts
15/11/2025 70,99 pts
Is your data incorrect?
Let us know