🚧 Beta Version - Bugs may occur. Report an issue
Photo of Claire Chastanier

Claire Chastanier

3 FONTAINES Member since May 2022
Ranking
C15 - 60 pts
Current points
240,00
Matches played
0 Last 6 months
Win rate
88% Last 10 matches
Best Performances
27/02/2025
Ranking at the time: C15.3 (45)
27/02/2025
Ranking at the time: C15.3 (45)
27/02/2025
Ranking at the time: C15.3 (45)

Player matches

VICTORY

Round: Final

2/6 7/6 1/0
vs Stephanie Boulenger C15.3 (45)
VICTORY

Round: Semi-final

6/0 6/2
vs Marie-Caroline Floor C15 (60)
VICTORY

Round: Quarter-final

6/0 6/2
vs Florinne Brisaert C15.2 (50) · Seed 4
VICTORY

Round: Last round of qualification

6/2 6/0
vs Louise Boulogne C15.2 (50) · Seed 1
VICTORY

Round: Qualification 1st round

6/3 6/4
vs Harmony Custers C30 (30)

Interclubs matches

Loss

Dames 25 REG 2 · Round 4

Sun 24 May

0.5 2.5
Away · vs OREE A (OREE)

Individual matches

V 0/6 6/2 7/5
Loss

Dames 25 REG 2 · Round 2

Sun 10 May

0 3
Away · vs RAQUETTE WAVRE A (RAQUETTE WAVRE)

Individual matches

V 1/6 6/2 6/2
Loss

Dames 25 REG 2 · Round 1

Sun 26 Apr

0 3
Home · vs OMBRAGE A (OMBRAGE)

Individual matches

D 6/2 3/6 6/3

Ranking and club history

Ranking and clubs evolution over time

C15 Current 60 3 FONTAINES
B+4/6 01/10/2025 65 3 FONTAINES
B+4/6 01/05/2025 65 3 FONTAINES
C15.3 01/10/2024 45 3 FONTAINES
C15.5 01/05/2024 35 3 FONTAINES
C15.5 01/10/2023 35 3 FONTAINES
C15.5 01/05/2023 35 3 FONTAINES
C15.4 01/10/2022 40 3 FONTAINES
C15.4 01/05/2022 40 3 FONTAINES
C15.4 01/10/2021 40 LAMBERMONT (BRABANT)
C15.3 01/10/2020 45 LAMBERMONT (BRABANT)
C15.2 01/10/2019 50 LAMBERMONT (BRABANT)
C15.2 01/10/2018 50 LAMBERMONT (BRABANT)
C30 01/10/2017 30 LAMBERMONT (BRABANT)
C15.5 01/10/2016 35 LAMBERMONT (BRABANT)
C15.5 01/10/2015 35 LAMBERMONT (BRABANT)
C30 01/10/2014 30 LAMBERMONT (BRABANT)
C30.2 01/10/2013 20 LAMBERMONT (BRABANT)
NC 01/10/2012 1 EVERE WS

Points history

How your points (cumulative ranking) changed over time.

28/05/2026 240,00 pts
13/05/2026 180,00 pts
10/11/2025 201,12 pts
Is your data incorrect?
Let us know