🚧 Beta Version - Bugs may occur. Report an issue
Photo of Nathan Bevilacqua

Nathan Bevilacqua

Ranking
C30.1 - 25 pts
Current points
37,44
Matches played
0 Last 6 months
Win rate
40% Last 10 matches
Best Performance
04/09/2025
Ranking at the time: C30.2 (20)

Player matches

DEFEAT

Round: Final

6/4 2/6 6/0
vs Guillaume Marcoux C30 (30)
VICTORY

Round: Semi-final

6/2 6/2
vs Aymeric Verbaert C30.1 (25) · Seed 2
VICTORY

Round: Quarter-final

7/6 6/2
vs Nathan Seutin C30.5 (5)
DEFEAT

Round: Last round of qualification

6/1 6/4
vs Gilles Hamidouch C30.4 (10)
VICTORY

Round: Qualification 1st round

6/3 6/2
vs Nicolas Devos C30.4 (10)
DEFEAT

Round: Quarter-final

6/0 7/6
vs Nicolas Huijens C30 (30) · Seed 1
DEFEAT

Round: Final

6/1 6/1
vs Jeremy Waegemans C30 (30)
VICTORY

Round: Semi-final

W.O.
VICTORY

Round: Quarter-final

6/4 6/3
vs Sasha Vandendaele C30.3 (15)
DEFEAT

Round: Final

6/2 6/0
vs Maxime Maniet C30.3 (15)
VICTORY

Round: Semi-final

6/4 6/2
vs Thomas Mortiaux C30.4 (10)
DEFEAT

Round: Last round of qualification

7/5 6/4
vs Kasey Jadin C30.1 (25)
VICTORY

Round: Qualification 2nd round

W.O.
vs Stefano Cefalo C30.4 (10)
DEFEAT

Round: Last round of qualification

6/2 6/2
vs Milan Dasset C30.1 (25)
VICTORY

Round: Qualification 2nd round

6/4 4/6
vs Nicolas Degeye C30.2 (20)
Showing 1-15 of 18 matches

Interclubs matches

Win

Messieurs REG 5 · Round 5

Sun 24 May

2 1
Away · vs VENERIE A (TPS CLUB LA VENERIE)

Individual matches

D 6/4 7/5
Loss

Messieurs REG 5 · Round 4

Sun 17 May

0 3
Home · vs VAUTOUR A (VAUTOUR T.C.)

Individual matches

D 6/4 6/2
Win

Messieurs REG 5 · Round 2

Sun 26 Apr

2 1
Home · vs MOULINAPAPIER A (T.C. MOULIN A PAPIER)

Individual matches

D 6/3 6/0
Win

Messieurs REG 5 · Round 1

Sun 19 Apr

3 0
Home · vs DOTTIGNIEN A (R. T.C. DOTTIGNIEN)

Individual matches

V 6/4 1/6 6/2

Ranking and club history

Ranking and clubs evolution over time

Points history

How your points (cumulative ranking) changed over time.

14/05/2026 37,44 pts
01/11/2025 102,50 pts
Is your data incorrect?
Let us know