🚧 Beta Version - Bugs may occur. Report an issue
Photo of Magali Nguyen Boeker

Magali Nguyen Boeker

BAUDOUIN (Liège) Member since October 2017
Ranking
B0 - 75 pts
Current points
427,73
Matches played
0 Last 6 months
Win rate
60% Last 10 matches

Player matches

No tournament match

This player has no match recorded from tournaments under Tennis Vlaanderen and Tennis Wallonie-Bruxelles since early 2025.

Interclubs matches

Win

Dames REG 2 · Round 4

Sat 23 May

2.5 0.5
Away · vs LONGCHAMPS A (LONGCHAMPS)

Individual matches

V
Elise Royer B+2/6
6/1 6/2
Draw

Dames REG 2 · Round 3

Sat 16 May

1.5 1.5
Home · vs VISE A (VISE)

Individual matches

V
Joanne Leens B+2/6
6/1 6/0
Loss

Dames REG 2 · Round 2

Sat 9 May

0.5 2.5
Away · vs WAREMMIEN A (WAREMMIEN)

Individual matches

D 6/4 4/6 6/1
Win

Dames REG 2 · Round 1

Sat 25 Apr

3 0
Home · vs FLEMALLE A (FLEMALLE)

Individual matches

D 6/4 6/1

Ranking and club history

Ranking and clubs evolution over time

B0 Current 75 BAUDOUIN (Liège)
B-2/6 01/10/2025 80 BAUDOUIN (Liège)
B0 01/05/2025 75 BAUDOUIN (Liège)
B0 01/10/2024 75 BAUDOUIN (Liège)
B0 01/05/2024 75 BAUDOUIN (Liège)
B0 01/10/2023 75 BAUDOUIN (Liège)
B+2/6 01/05/2023 70 BAUDOUIN (Liège)
B+2/6 01/10/2022 70 BAUDOUIN (Liège)
B+4/6 01/05/2022 65 BAUDOUIN (Liège)
B+4/6 01/10/2021 65 BAUDOUIN (Liège)
B+2/6 01/10/2020 70 BAUDOUIN (Liège)
B0 01/10/2019 75 BAUDOUIN (Liège)
B+4/6 01/10/2018 65 BAUDOUIN (Liège)
C30 01/10/2017 30 BAUDOUIN (Liège)
C15.5 01/10/2016 35 FAYEN BOIS
C15.5 01/10/2015 35 FAYEN BOIS
C30.1 01/10/2014 25 FAYEN BOIS
C30.3 01/10/2013 15 FAYEN BOIS
C30.3 01/10/2012 15 COQ MOSAN
C30.3 01/10/2011 15 COQ MOSAN
C30.2 01/10/2010 20 T.C. COQ MOSAN
C30.2 01/10/2009 20 T.C. COQ MOSAN
C30.2 01/10/2008 20 T.C. COQ MOSAN
NC 01/10/2007 1 T.C. COQ MOSAN
NC 01/10/2006 1 TENNIS OUPEYE CLUB
NC 01/10/2005 1 TENNIS OUPEYE CLUB
NC 01/10/2004 1 TENNIS OUPEYE CLUB

Points history

How your points (cumulative ranking) changed over time.

28/05/2026 427,73 pts
14/05/2026 0,00 pts
19/11/2025 516,53 pts
Is your data incorrect?
Let us know