🚧 Beta Version - Bugs may occur. Report an issue
Photo of Maxime Josse

Maxime Josse

BRAIVES Member since October 2009
Ranking
B+4/6 - 65 pts
Current points
550,67
Matches played
0 Last 6 months
Win rate
67% Last 10 matches
Best Performances
24/07/2025
Ranking at the time: B+4/6 (65)
Messieurs REG 4 Upset
10/05/2026
Ranking at the time: B+4/6 (65)

Player matches

DEFEAT

Round: Semi-final

6/2 7/5
vs Aymeric Delcour B+4/6 (65)
VICTORY

Round: Quarter-final

6/0 6/4
vs Sacha Mercenier B+2/6 (70) · Seed 2
VICTORY

Round: Last round of qualification

6/2 6/4
vs Hugo Josse C15.3 (45)
DEFEAT

Round: Pre-qualification 1st round

6/0 6/2
vs Hubert David B+4/6 (65)
DEFEAT

Round: Last round of qualification

6/2 6/3
vs Medhi Hijari C15 (60)

Interclubs matches

Win

Messieurs REG 4 · Round 4

Thu 14 May

3 0
Home · vs AYWAILLE A (AYWAILLE)

Individual matches

V 6/2 6/3
Loss

Messieurs REG 4 · Round 3

Thu 14 May

0 3
Away · vs FAYEN BOIS A (FAYEN BOIS)

Individual matches

V
Damien Adam B+2/6
1/6 7/6 6/0
Loss

Messieurs REG 4 · Round 2

Sun 10 May

0 3
Home · vs TROOZ B (TROOZ)

Individual matches

V
Arnaud Jamin B+2/6
6/3 7/6
Win

Messieurs REG 4 · Round 1

Sun 26 Apr

3 0
Home · vs TROISPONTS A (TROISPONTS)

Individual matches

V 6/1 6/2

Ranking and club history

Ranking and clubs evolution over time

B+4/6 Current 65 BRAIVES
B+4/6 01/10/2025 65 BRAIVES
B+4/6 01/05/2025 65 BRAIVES
B+2/6 01/10/2024 70 BRAIVES
B+2/6 01/05/2024 70 BRAIVES
B+2/6 01/10/2023 70 BRAIVES
C15.1 01/05/2023 55 BRAIVES
C15 01/10/2022 60 BRAIVES
C15.2 01/05/2022 50 BRAIVES
C15.3 01/10/2021 45 BRAIVES
C15.5 01/10/2020 35 BRAIVES
C30 01/10/2019 30 BRAIVES
C30.1 01/10/2018 25 BRAIVES
C30.3 01/10/2017 15 BRAIVES
C30.4 01/10/2016 10 BRAIVES
C30.4 01/10/2015 10 BRAIVES
C30.4 01/10/2014 10 BRAIVES
C30.4 01/10/2013 10 BRAIVES
C30.5 01/10/2012 5 BRAIVES
NC 01/10/2011 1 BRAIVES
NC 01/10/2010 1 BRAIVES
NC 01/10/2009 1 BRAIVES

Points history

How your points (cumulative ranking) changed over time.

15/05/2026 550,67 pts
14/11/2025 430,37 pts
Is your data incorrect?
Let us know